A Denmark-based man has been convicted of sharing sexually explicit segments from copyrighted films and television shows on the online site Reddit.
According to a law enforcement report reviewed by media outlets, the unnamed individual posted 347 video excerpts of explicit scenes in a subreddit he moderated, which were then watched 4.2 million-plus times.
The country's police state he has been handed a 7-month suspended jail term for copyright infringement.
Legal analysts say the defendant was charged under a rarely-used provision in Danish intellectual property legislation, with the court finding that by taking the footage out of their original context, the man had harmed the artists' "ethical entitlements".
He has additionally been found guilty of sharing more than 25 terabytes of protected digital content.
From March 2022 to mid-2023, the user using the alias "the pseudonym KlammereFyr" on Reddit posted adult scenes including over 100 actresses.
He distributed them in the forum he was a administrator of.
According to the Denmark's anti-piracy group the Rights Alliance, his subreddit had more than 6,000 members and participants were prompted to ask for excerpts of particular actors.
In last year, campaigners reported the case to the police on behalf of the impacted artists, filmmakers and producers, which led to the forum being closed down.
Andrea Vagn Jensen, one of the performers whose explicit scenes were circulated in the community, explained to Danish broadcasters at the period she believed there was a distinction between being seen unclothed in a film and being shown on Reddit.
The actress said the uploads constituted "abuse".
The man was detained in September 2024 and pleaded culpable to the allegations last month.
In a comment following the ruling, TRA head Maria Fredenslund remarked the outcome sent an "important" signal "indicating infringements of artists' entitlements has consequences".
The ruling is considered unique in Denmark for its application of the "ethical protections" section of the Danish Copyright Act, which states an artist's creation cannot be used in a manner which infringes upon their reputation.
Intellectual property expert a legal scholar informed the media the legal matter was "rare" for its focus on the damage to the dignity of an performer, rather than to them financially.
The extent to which the case could affect nations abroad is unclear.
But she added there may be "more and more of these actions" in the coming years with the growth of artificial intelligence, where "the integrity of an individual's work might be tempered with with greater ease".
Fashion enthusiast and deal hunter, sharing tips and trends to help you save on stylish finds.